RSS: Quatloos!  | XML

Friday, March 30, 2012

Real Tax Protestors... and Chess

You might know, from my other blog, that I am interested in chess. Well, just for the heck of it, I searched on the Internet for "tax protester AND chess" (yes, yes, I know the "AND" operation here is unnecessary) -- and, quite surprisingly, found something quite enlightening.

I was referred to the Wikipedia page about Ralph Ginzburg. Turns out he conducted a famous 1962 interview with Robert "Bobby" Fischer, who later won the world chess championship, ending Russian domination of the field since the Russian emigre Alexander Alekhine won the title in 1927, or, less dramatically, since the Soviet master Mikhail Botvinnik won the world championship in 1948.

The late Ginzburg, most famous for publishing Eros magazine (link NSFW as it contain some nudity, but is not a porn site), was also a tax protester. Surprising, you say? Well, he was a real tax protester. He protested the war in the Writers and Editors War Tax Protest (scroll down for details, but the web site is well worth reading).

Some major differences between the two groups -- the real tax protesters and the fake ones, the tax deniers who call themselves "protesters":

1). The real protesters didn't deny they have a legal obligation to pay income tax. They knew they were breaking the law and expected to be punished for it. Unlike the tax deniers, who think they aren't legally bound to pay taxes.

2). The real protesters didn't think they shouldn't pay any tax. They specifically limited their protest to refuse the particular share of their taxes that went directly to a purpose -- the Vietnam war -- they thought they cannot morally support. This unlike the tax deniers, who don't actually "protest" anything the government does with the taxes, but simply the fact that they pay tax at all.

3). The real tax protesters didn't think people should get some sort of special veto power and only pay taxes for purposes they like. The correct way to deal with a tax that goes towards a purpose you think is wrong is, they would surely agree, almost always to elect as legislator someone who would repeal that tax. It is only in what they consider a very extreme case (in their view) that the duty to pay taxes is overruled. This as opposed to tax deniers who latch to any annoying or stupid government use of tax money as "proof" one should not pay taxes.

One need not agree with their anti-Vietnam war views to agree that their "yes, we need to pay taxes, but in this particular case we won't and break the law since it's morally important" is quite different than the "don't wanna, don't hafta, not gonna" attitude of the tax deniers.

Labels: ,


At October 10, 2013 at 12:44 PM , Blogger Frederick Ustinov said...

Umm, OK- The tax "deniers" actions are based mostly on the legal definition of "income", which is NOT "everything that comes in". But we, as a people, are too stupid to figure out the trap. Usage of the term "income" is very far from uniform and unambiguous, so it should not be used in law without a definition and only a new Amendment can legally produce one. Since in Subtitle A of Title 26 it has been so used anyway, that Subtitle - the entire alleged "income tax" - is based upon a literally meaningless term and is, therefore, void. Bouvier's Law Dictionary defines "income" as "The GAIN which proceeds from property, labor, or business; it is applied particularly to individuals; the income of the government is usually called revenue."
There is no "gain" from labor in a less-than-even even trade for wages BTW. Wages have never been legally declared taxable.

At January 2, 2018 at 9:30 AM , Blogger Vanwingerden Urick said...

In conclusion, when you have to utilize a Payday credit supplier, you will require a few things. Most Payday advance organizations expect you to have one or a few pay check stubs to confirm that you will have the assets to pay them back.www.usacheckcashingstore.com/san-diego usapaydayloanstore.com/chicago aaa1autotitleloans.com/chicago usacheckcashingstore.com/chula-vista usacheckcashingstore.com/corona

At June 9, 2018 at 11:08 AM , Blogger Litz Harly said...

I utilized pdl help, Inc. They require a forthright charge to take your case however they will work with you on paying it and it is around $200. payday loans san diego


Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home

Recent Discussions

Discussions Forums


Previous Posts

Have a question for Quatloos?

 Report A Fraud


Ye Old Quatloos!       |       Quatloos Version 2.05

© 2002- by Quatloosia Publishing LLC. All rights reserved. No portion of this website may be reprinted in whole or in part without the express, written permission of Quatloosia Publishing LLC. This site is http://www.quatloos.com. Legal issues should be faxed to (877) 698-0678. Our attorneys are Grobaty & Pitet LLP (http://grobatypitet.com) and Riser Adkisson LLP (http://risad.com).

Management of Pay Per Click


Web Development by John Barrick